# Black Holes, Page Curves and Islands: Has the Information Paradox Been Solved?

- Link: https://jarlhalla.com/black-holes-page-curves-and-islands-has-the-information-paradox-been-solved/
- Published: 2026-08-11T11:31:29+02:00
- Author: knoksen

## Introduction

At the intersection of general relativity and quantum mechanics lies a profound 
contradiction that has plagued theoretical physics for nearly half a century: the
black hole information paradox. When a massive star collapses under its own gravitational
pull to form a black hole, it leaves behind a region of spacetime so severely warped
that, classically, nothing can escape its grasp. According to Albert Einstein’s 
general relativity, the black hole is a perfect cosmic incinerator, defined entirely
by its mass, charge, and angular momentum. However, when the rules of quantum mechanics
are applied to the spacetime surrounding this gravitational behemoth, the black 
hole begins to radiate thermal energy, gradually shrinking and eventually evaporating
away completely.

This evaporation process, first described by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s, introduced
an existential crisis for the foundation of modern physics. If a black hole forms
from a complex physical system—such as a collapsing star possessing a specific quantum
state—and subsequently evaporates into a featureless cloud of thermal radiation,
the precise quantum information regarding the initial state appears to be irrevocably
lost. This outcome directly violates the principle of quantum unitarity, a foundational
tenet of quantum mechanics which dictates that information must always be conserved,
allowing the past to be reconstructed from the present, and the future to be predicted
with probabilistic certainty. If information is truly destroyed in a black hole,
the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics must be modified or abandoned. Conversely,
if information escapes, general relativity and the principle of equivalence—which
states that the event horizon should not be a special or dramatic place for a freely
falling observer—must be drastically revised.

For decades, this paradox stood as an impenetrable wall preventing the unification
of gravity and quantum mechanics. However, recent breakthroughs in theoretical physics,
stemming from the study of holographic dualities, entanglement entropy, and gravitational
path integrals, have provided a stunning new perspective. By introducing concepts
such as “quantum extremal surfaces,” “islands,” and “replica wormholes,” physicists
have recently demonstrated how the mathematics of semiclassical gravity can, surprisingly,
compute a trajectory for black hole evaporation that is consistent with the conservation
of information. This trajectory is known as the Page curve.

The objective of this comprehensive analysis is to trace the evolution of the black
hole information paradox from its inception to the cutting-edge developments of 
the 2020s. We will explore the historical context of Hawking radiation, the role
of string theory and D-branes in counting microstates, and the modern holographic
techniques that have led to the calculation of the Page curve. Crucially, this analysis
will clearly distinguish between the mathematically established results of recent
years and the unresolved physical interpretations regarding the exact mechanism 
of information escape. Ultimately, we will evaluate whether the information paradox
has been truly “solved” or if we have merely discovered a deeper layer to the mystery
of quantum gravity.

## Section 1: Historical Context

To comprehend the magnitude of the recent resolutions involving islands and replica
wormholes, one must first understand the origins of the black hole information paradox
and the pivotal milestones that defined its early history. The story begins not 
with quantum mechanics, but with classical general relativity and the laws of thermodynamics.

### The No-Hair Theorem and Bekenstein’s Insight

In the 1960s and early 1970s, theoretical physicists including John Archibald Wheeler,
Werner Israel, and Brandon Carter established what came to be known as the “no-hair
theorem.” This theorem posited that an isolated black hole rapidly settles into 
a stationary state characterized by only three observable classical parameters: 
mass ($M$), electric charge ($Q$), and angular momentum ($J$). All other information
about the matter that formed the black hole—its chemical composition, its structural
asymmetry, or its internal quantum numbers—is hidden behind the event horizon. To
an outside observer, the black hole is completely featureless; it has “no hair.”

This classical picture immediately raised a thermodynamic problem. If one throws
a hot cup of coffee—a system with a well-defined entropy—into a black hole, the 
coffee disappears behind the horizon. To an outside observer, the total entropy 
of the visible universe appears to have decreased, a direct violation of the Second
Law of Thermodynamics. To resolve this, Jacob Bekenstein proposed in 1972 that black
holes themselves must possess entropy. Bekenstein argued that the entropy of a black
hole is proportional to the surface area of its event horizon ($A$). This profound
insight bridged the gap between gravity and thermodynamics, leading to the generalized
second law of thermodynamics.

### Hawking Radiation and the Genesis of the Paradox

While Bekenstein’s proposal was elegant, it faced a severe theoretical hurdle: if
a black hole has entropy, the laws of thermodynamics dictate that it must also have
a non-zero temperature. And if it has a temperature, it must radiate. But classically,
nothing can escape a black hole.

In 1974, Stephen Hawking set out to resolve this by applying quantum field theory
in curved spacetime to the geometry of a collapsing black hole. Hawking discovered
that quantum vacuum fluctuations near the event horizon cause the black hole to 
emit a steady stream of particles. Due to the extreme gravitational field, particle-
antiparticle pairs that continuously pop in and out of existence in the vacuum can
be separated; one particle falls into the singularity, carrying negative energy,
while the other escapes to infinity as positive-energy radiation. This phenomenon,
known as Hawking radiation, proved that black holes do indeed radiate and have a
temperature inversely proportional to their mass.

Hawking’s calculation solidified the formula for black hole entropy, now known as
the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy:

$$S_{BH} = \frac{k_B A}{4 \ell_P^2}$$

where $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, $A$ is the area of the event horizon, and
$\ell_P$ is the Planck length.

However, Hawking’s magnificent discovery contained a poison pill. Hawking demonstrated
that the radiation emitted by the black hole is perfectly thermal, meaning it depends
only on the black hole’s macroscopic parameters ($M, Q, J$) and is entirely devoid
of any detailed quantum information about the matter that formed the black hole.
As the black hole radiates, it loses mass and shrinks, eventually evaporating completely.

If the initial state of the collapsing star was a “pure” quantum state (possessing
zero entanglement entropy), and the final state is a cloud of perfectly thermal 
Hawking radiation (a “mixed” state with high entropy), the evolution of the system
violates quantum unitarity. Mathematically, a unitary operator $U$ cannot evolve
a pure state into a mixed state. Information has been destroyed. This is the black
hole information paradox.

### Early Resolutions and String Theoretic Microstates

For decades, physicists debated the resolution. Some, including Hawking initially,
believed that unitarity was fundamentally flawed and that information was truly 
lost. Others believed that the information was encoded in correlations between the
Hawking radiation particles, though Hawking’s calculation seemed to rule this out.
Still, others proposed that the evaporation stops at the Planck scale, leaving behind
a microscopic “remnant” containing all the information, though this posed severe
thermodynamic problems.

The first major hint that quantum mechanics might emerge victorious came from string
theory. If the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy $S_{BH}$ represents the thermodynamic 
entropy of a black hole, statistical mechanics dictates that it must correspond 
to the natural logarithm of the number of microscopic quantum states (microstates)
available to the system: $S = k_B \ln(\Omega)$. For years, finding these microstates
was impossible.

In 1996, string theorists Andrew Strominger and Cumrun Vafa achieved a monumental
breakthrough. By constructing a specific class of supersymetric, extremal black 
holes using multidimensional membranes known as “D-branes,” they were able to count
the quantum microstates of the black hole explicitly. The statistical entropy they
calculated perfectly matched the Bekenstein-Hawking area formula.

This result strongly implied that black holes are ordinary quantum mechanical systems
with a finite number of degrees of freedom. If black holes are just highly complex
quantum systems, their evolution must be unitary, and the information must somehow
escape in the radiation, even if the semiclassical calculation fails to show it.
The challenge for the next twenty years became finding exactly _where_ Hawking’s
calculation broke down and _how_ the information gets out.

## Section 2: Current Relevance

To understand the modern approach to the information paradox, we must shift our 
focus from the black hole itself to the structure of the radiation it emits. The
current relevance of this field is entirely dominated by the concept of holographic
duality and a highly specific graph known as the Page curve, which serves as the
ultimate diagnostic tool for quantum unitarity.

### The Holographic Principle and AdS/CFT

In 1997, Juan Maldacena formulated the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/
CFT) correspondence. This duality states that a theory of quantum gravity in an 
Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime—a universe with a negative cosmological constant,
often visualized as a hyperbolic cylinder—is exactly mathematically equivalent to
a standard quantum field theory (the CFT) living on the boundary of that spacetime.

Because the boundary CFT is a standard quantum system, it is strictly unitary. The
AdS/CFT correspondence strongly implies that the gravitational theory in the “bulk”
of the spacetime must also be unitary. If one forms a black hole in the bulk AdS
spacetime and lets it evaporate, the entire process must correspond to a unitary
process on the boundary. Therefore, in the context of string theory and holography,
the information paradox is resolved in principle: information cannot be lost. However,
this did not answer _how_ gravity manages to preserve the information, nor did it
point out the flaw in Hawking’s original gravity calculation.

### Don Page and the Page Curve

In 1993, theoretical physicist Don Page published a seminal paper analyzing how 
information should emerge from an evaporating black hole if the process is perfectly
unitary. Page utilized the concept of von Neumann entanglement entropy to track 
the information.

Imagine dividing the universe into two parts: the black hole (B) and the emitted
Hawking radiation (R). If the entire universe is in a pure state, the entanglement
entropy of the black hole, $S(B)$, must always equal the entanglement entropy of
the radiation, $S(R)$.

Hawking’s calculation stated that as the black hole emits thermal radiation, the
entropy of the radiation $S(R)$ increases monotonically until the black hole disappears.
If the radiation’s entropy just keeps going up, the final state is mixed, and information
is lost.

Page pointed out that if the process is unitary, the radiation cannot continue to
become more entangled indefinitely. The entanglement entropy of the radiation is
bounded by the total remaining thermodynamic entropy of the black hole. Initially,
as radiation is emitted, $S(R)$ increases. However, near the midpoint of the black
hole’s life—a point now known as the “Page time”—the thermodynamic entropy of the
shrinking black hole drops below the entanglement entropy of the radiation. At this
point, the newly emitted radiation must be highly entangled with the early radiation,
rather than with the black hole interior.

Therefore, for a unitary evaporation process, the entanglement entropy of the radiation
$S(R)$ must rise initially, peak at the Page time, and then strictly decrease back
down to zero when the black hole is fully evaporated. This characteristic inverted-
V shape is known as the **Page curve**.

If theoretical physicists could find a way to calculate the entanglement entropy
of Hawking radiation using the rules of gravity and naturally derive the Page curve(
rather than Hawking’s continuously rising curve), it would be the holy grail of 
black hole thermodynamics. It would prove how general relativity naturally encodes
the rescue of quantum information.

### Geometric Entropy: Ryu-Takayanagi and Quantum Extremal Surfaces

The bridge to calculating the Page curve from gravity came through a series of discoveries
linking entanglement entropy to spacetime geometry. In 2006, Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi
Takayanagi proposed a holographic formula for entanglement entropy. In the AdS/CFT
correspondence, to find the entanglement entropy of a region on the boundary, one
must find a minimal surface area in the bulk spacetime that is homologous to that
boundary region. The area of this minimal surface, divided by $4G_N$ (Newton’s constant),
gives the entanglement entropy.

This formula was generalized to dynamic, time-evolving spacetimes by Veronika Hubeny,
Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi (the HRT formula), which utilized the concept
of “extremal surfaces.”

However, these surfaces were classical. In 2014, Netta Engelhardt and Aron Wall 
introduced a crucial quantum correction. They proposed that one should look for **
Quantum Extremal Surfaces (QES)**. To find the entanglement entropy of a system,
one must extremize a generalized entropy functional that includes not just the classical
area of the surface, but also the bulk quantum entanglement entropy of the matter
fields on one side of the surface:

$$S_{gen} = \frac{\text{Area}(X)}{4G_N} + S_{semi}(\Sigma_X)$$

where $X$ is the surface, and $\Sigma_X$ is the spatial region bounded by $X$. This
formula laid the critical groundwork for the breakthroughs that would follow five
years later, providing the exact mathematical machinery needed to track the flow
of information during black hole evaporation.

## Section 3: Practical Applications (Theoretical and Computational Breakthroughs)

The true watershed moment in resolving the black hole information paradox computationally
occurred in 2019. Two independent sets of researchers—Geoff Penington on one side,
and Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, and Henry Maxfield (collectively
known as AEMM) on the other—applied the Quantum Extremal Surface prescription directly
to the process of an evaporating black hole. Their results fundamentally altered
the landscape of theoretical physics.

### The Island Formula

To compute the entanglement entropy of the outgoing Hawking radiation, one must 
find the quantum extremal surface that minimizes the generalized entropy. Before
2019, physicists assumed that the relevant surface for the radiation simply sat 
at the origin, meaning the entropy of the radiation was solely dictated by the quantum
fields comprising the radiation itself. This assumption perfectly reproduces Hawking’s
original result: the entropy monotonically increases.

However, Penington and AEMM discovered a second, previously overlooked quantum extremal
surface. After the Page time, when the black hole has significantly evaporated, 
the generalized entropy equation develops a new extremum located _inside_ the event
horizon of the black hole.

This realization led to the “Island Formula” for the entanglement entropy of Hawking
radiation:

$$S(Rad) = \text{min} \, \text{ext} \left[ \frac{\text{Area}(\partial I)}{4 G_N}
+ S_{semi}(Rad \cup I) \right]$$

This formula asserts something deeply counterintuitive, yet mathematically rigorous.
To calculate the exact quantum entanglement entropy of the radiation far away from
the black hole, one must include the quantum fields in a specific disconnected spatial
region _inside_ the black hole. This interior region is known as the **“Island”**(
$I$), and its boundary is the quantum extremal surface ($\partial I$).

### How the Island Recovers the Page Curve

Before the Page time, the classical area of the black hole is large. Creating an
island requires paying a massive geometric “penalty” equal to $\frac{\text{Area}(\
partial I)}{4G_N}$. Therefore, the minimization procedure in the island formula 
dictates that the island is the empty set (no island exists). Without an island,
the formula just measures the semiclassical entropy of the radiation, which rises
steadily according to Hawking’s calculation.

However, as the black hole evaporates, its horizon area shrinks, meaning the geometric
penalty for creating an island decreases. Simultaneously, the radiation collects
a massive amount of entanglement with the interior partners of the Hawking particles.
At exactly the Page time, the mathematical scales tip. The state with an island 
inside the black hole becomes the global minimum for the generalized entropy functional.

Once the island appears, the rules change completely. The formula now states that
the entropy of the radiation is calculated by looking at the union of the radiation
_and_ the island. But the island contains the interior partners of the Hawking particles!
Because the interior partners are maximally entangled with the exterior radiation,
taking their union effectively “purifies” the state. The overall entanglement entropy
stops rising and begins to plummet, tracking exactly with the decreasing area of
the black hole.

The application of the Island formula perfectly reproduces the Page curve. For the
first time, gravity was shown to calculate a unitary evaporation process, without
relying directly on string theory microstate counting or the AdS/CFT boundary. The
semiclassical gravitational path integral is seemingly “smart enough” to know about
unitarity.

### Replica Wormholes: The Mechanism Under the Hood

The Island formula represents an astonishing success, but it acts like a black box.
Why should observers studying radiation far away in flat space suddenly have to 
include an island located inside a black hole when computing entropy? The physical
justification stems from the deep mathematical structure of Euclidean quantum gravity,
specifically through constructs known as **replica wormholes**.

In quantum field theory, computing von Neumann entropy directly is notoriously difficult
due to the logarithm of the density matrix. Physicists instead use the “replica 
trick.” To find the entropy of a state, they calculate the trace of the density 
matrix raised to the $n$-th power, $\text{Tr}(\rho^n)$, by theoretically gluing 
$n$ identical copies (or “replicas”) of the spacetime geometry together along a 
branch cut. One then analytically continues $n \to 1$ to extract the entropy.

When Penington, AEMM, and other researchers (such as Saad, Shenker, and Stanford)
applied the replica trick to gravitational path integrals, they made a shocking 
discovery. In gravity, the geometry is not fixed; one must sum over all possible
geometries that connect the boundary conditions of the $n$ replicas.

When computing the entropy of the late-time radiation, the dominant gravitational
geometry in the path integral is not $n$ disconnected black holes. Instead, classical
solutions to the Euclidean equations of motion emerge that connect the interiors
of the $n$ different black holes through smooth, geometrical bridges. These are 
the **replica wormholes**.

The existence of these wormhole geometries in the calculation of $\text{Tr}(\rho
^n)$ directly gives rise to the Island formula when taking the limit $n \to 1$. 
The island is the remnant of these wormhole connections. Thus, the macroscopic entanglement
between the early Hawking radiation and the black hole interior essentially distorts
the fabric of spacetime in the replica calculation, bridging the interiors and yielding
the unitary Page curve.

### Delineating Math from Physical Interpretation

While the mathematical derivation of the Page curve via replica wormholes is highly
robust and widely accepted in the theoretical physics community, it is crucial to
clearly separate these established computational results from unresolved physical
interpretations.

Has the paradox been “solved”? Mathematically, yes. We now have a gravitational 
calculation that demonstrates unitarity.

However, physically, a profound mystery remains. The Island formula dictates _that_
information escapes, but it does not tell us _how_ it escapes dynamically. If an
astronaut jumps into an old black hole and lands in the island region, the Island
formula implies that the astronaut’s information is somehow encoded in the Hawking
radiation located millions of lightyears away. How is this possible without violating
causality or the speed of light? The replica wormholes appear only in the mathematical
Euclidean calculation of the entropy; they do not represent physical wormholes through
which particles traverse in real Lorentz-signature time.

The precise physical mechanism by which information is teleported from the interior
to the exterior, and how one could practically construct an operator on the radiation
to decode the interior, remains heavily contested and largely unresolved.

## Section 4: Future Implications

The discovery of islands and replica wormholes has fundamentally shifted the trajectory
of high-energy theoretical physics, opening up vast new avenues of research and 
posing new challenges that will dominate the field for the foreseeable future. The
implications of these discoveries stretch far beyond black holes, touching upon 
the very nature of spacetime and the foundational principles of quantum gravity.

### Quantum Error Correction and Spacetime Emergence

One of the most profound implications of the recent black hole breakthroughs is 
the deepening connection between gravity and quantum information theory, specifically
the concept of quantum error correction. In quantum computing, error-correcting 
codes are utilized to protect fragile quantum information from local environmental
decoherence by encoding a small amount of logical information non-locally across
many physical qubits.

The physics of black hole islands suggests that the universe utilizes similar principles
to structure spacetime. The fact that the interior of the black hole (the island)
is mathematically encoded in the exterior Hawking radiation perfectly mirrors the
structure of a quantum error-correcting code. An observer in the exterior cannot
access the information of the interior by collecting just a few Hawking photons;
they must collect a vast, highly entangled subset of the radiation (reaching past
the Page time) to reconstruct the interior operators.

Future research is intensely focused on mapping the exact dictionary between gravitational
entanglement wedge reconstruction and quantum error correcting networks. This suggests
a radical paradigm shift: spacetime itself may not be fundamental, but rather an
emergent property of quantum entanglement. The geometry of the universe may simply
be a macroscopic manifestation of microscopic quantum information.

### State Dependence and The Firewall Rebirth

While the Page curve calculation via islands demonstrates that the final state of
the radiation is pure, it does not immediately resolve the notorious AMPS Firewall
paradox, formulated in 2012 by Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski, and Sully. The Firewall
paradox argues that to preserve information, the entanglement between a particle
falling into the black hole and its outgoing Hawking partner must be broken, which
creates a massive wall of high-energy radiation (a firewall) right at the event 
horizon, violating Einstein’s equivalence principle.

The island calculation relies on the smoothness of the horizon, ostensibly avoiding
the firewall. However, reconstructing the interior of the black hole from the exterior
radiation seems to require operators that are “state-dependent”—meaning the physical
observables change depending on the specific microstate of the black hole. Standard
quantum mechanics strictly forbids state-dependent operators.

A major future challenge lies in reconciling this apparent conflict. Physicists 
are actively investigating whether non-isometric codes or modifications to quantum
mechanics are required for an observer to safely cross the event horizon without
burning up, or if firewalls are an unavoidable consequence of generic microstates.

### Non-Perturbative Quantum Gravity and the Role of String Theory

Perhaps the most startling aspect of the replica wormhole calculation is that it
was performed using the standard tools of semiclassical gravity—specifically, the
Euclidean gravitational path integral—without relying on the explicit microstate
machinery of string theory (such as D-branes).

This raises a crucial question for the future of theoretical physics: How much does
the semiclassical path integral actually “know” about the ultimate theory of quantum
gravity?

If semiclassical gravity can calculate the Page curve and prove unitarity on its
own, it suggests that many features of quantum gravity are independent of the specific
microscopic completion (like string theory or loop quantum gravity). However, replica
wormholes also introduce a potential problem known as the “factorization problem,”
which suggests that the path integral computes an average over an ensemble of different
quantum theories, rather than describing a single, specific universe. Resolving 
whether our universe is fundamentally described by an ensemble average, or if high-
energy, non-perturbative string theory corrections restore precise factorization,
is one of the most active battlegrounds in current research.

### Flat Space Holography and Cosmological Horizons

Almost all the recent successes involving quantum extremal surfaces and islands 
rely heavily on the mathematics of AdS/CFT, implying a universe with a negative 
cosmological constant. However, our observable universe is not AdS; it is expanding
at an accelerating rate, which is best described by a de Sitter (dS) spacetime with
a positive cosmological constant, or asymptotically flat spacetime.

A primary future objective is translating the machinery of islands and the Page 
curve to flat space and cosmology. Does the cosmological horizon of our expanding
universe also possess an entropy, and does it evolve unitarily? Do islands exist
in de Sitter space? Early preliminary research suggests that islands may indeed 
exist in cosmological models, potentially offering deep insights into the physics
of the Big Bang and the ultimate fate of the universe. Expanding the holographic
principle beyond AdS spacetime is an absolute necessity if these theoretical breakthroughs
are to be applied to the real, observable cosmos.

## Conclusion

The black hole information paradox has stood for nearly fifty years as the primary
catalyst for advancements in quantum gravity, forcing theoretical physicists to 
continually refine and often completely overhaul their understanding of the universe.
From Stephen Hawking’s initial, devastating calculation of thermal radiation to 
the string theoretic microstate counting of Strominger and Vafa, the path to resolution
has been non-linear and fraught with conceptual obstacles.

Today, we find ourselves in the midst of a theoretical renaissance. By leveraging
the principles of holographic duality and applying quantum corrections to geometric
surfaces, physicists have achieved what was once thought impossible: deriving the
Page curve from gravity itself. The discovery that the entanglement entropy of Hawking
radiation is governed by the Island formula, and that this formula emerges naturally
from the inclusion of replica wormholes in the gravitational path integral, constitutes
a monumental triumph. It mathematically demonstrates that the evolution of a black
hole is a unitary process, and that the information regarding the matter that formed
it is preserved, safely woven into the complex entanglement structure of the emitted
radiation.

Yet, we must exercise caution in declaring the paradox entirely “solved.” While 
the mathematics of the Page curve have been tamed, the physical narrative remains
profoundly opaque. The semiclassical calculations tell us with near certainty _that_
the information escapes, but they remain silent on the precise dynamical mechanisms
of _how_ the information physically bypasses the event horizon. The presence of 
state-dependent operators and the looming specter of the firewall paradox remind
us that we still lack a complete, microscopic understanding of the black hole interior.

In the final analysis, the introduction of islands and replica wormholes has fundamentally
rewritten the rules of engagement for quantum gravity. Spacetime is no longer viewed
as a static stage upon which quantum mechanics acts, but rather as an emergent, 
dynamic structure intimately bound to the flow of quantum information and entanglement.
As research shifts toward quantum error correction, cosmological horizons, and the
exact physical interpretation of the entanglement wedge, the legacy of the information
paradox continues to light the way. We may not have unearthed every secret of the
black hole, but we have, for the first time, been granted a mathematical glimpse
into the extraordinary ways in which the universe protects its most fundamental 
laws.

**References**

 1.  Almheiri, A., Engelhardt, N., Marolf, D., & Maxfield, H. (2019). The entropy of
     bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole. _Journal
     of High Energy Physics_, 2019(12), 63.
 2.  Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2013). Black holes: complementarity
     or firewalls? _Journal of High Energy Physics_, 2013(2), 62.
 3.  Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. _Physical Review D_, 7(8), 
     2333-2346.
 4.  Engelhardt, N., & Wall, A. C. (2015). Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement
     entropy beyond the classical regime. _Journal of High Energy Physics_, 2015(1),
     73.
 5.  Hawking, S. W. (1975). Particle creation by black holes. _Communications in Mathematical
     Physics_, 43(3), 199-220.
 6.  Hawking, S. W. (1976). Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse. 
     _Physical Review D_, 14(10), 2460-2473.
 7.  Maldacena, J. M. (1998). The large N limit of superconformal field theories and
     supergravity. _Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics_, 2(2), 231-252.
 8.  Page, D. N. (1993). Information in black hole radiation. _Physical Review Letters_,
     71(23), 3743-3746.
 9.  Penington, G. (2020). Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox.
     _Journal of High Energy Physics_, 2020(9), 2.
 10. Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006). Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy
     from AdS/CFT. _Physical Review Letters_, 96(18), 181602.
 11. Strominger, A., & Vafa, C. (1996). Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking
     entropy. _Physics Letters B_, 379(1-4), 99-104.

Black Holes, Page Curves and Islands: Has the Information Paradox Been Solved?